Wednesday, March 29, 2006

i can attest that i've never chosen to come here. neither did my parents or even the few generations before that. my mother's ancestors crossed the atlantic on the same boat that carried jeanne-mance before she founded schools and hospitals and a street eventually was named after her. my irish ancestors, god knows really when they came.

there was a story this morning in the newspaper, a 16 year old girl born in ivory coast who came here at the age of 6. her father had met a quebecois woman who later married and sponsored him and his daughter. only, he was already married in ivory coast - which respected the traditional polygamous values of the land he comes from. the marriage with his quebecois wife was broken off a couple of years later and the woman reported her ex-husband saying he should not have been granted citizenship because he was married more than once at a time (polygamy is illegal in canada). now, i really don't want to argue whether or not it is fair for him to be deported on that sole basis, that is another story and i'm not entirely sure where i stand on that issue.

so, bring it back to the daughter. there was an error in handling her case and it was eventually written in her file that she had been sponsored by her father. it is wrong. since her father came on false pretenses (he had not told anyone he was already married in his home country) she should also be denied entry. she was granted citizenship years ago, has no relatives in ivory coast, goes to a private school where she's involved in choir, drama, improv. her life is here.

her father's case is still pending and she'll most likely be deported before he is.

i have not chosen to live in this country, yet i enjoy everything it has to offer and i never question the fact that i deserve all of this. i am most often cynical and critical about government policies, yet no one ever thinks of looking up my file and proposing to ship me off back to france or ireland. it would be ludicrous to do so.

what i find shocking, however, is that citizenship can be granted and revoked because of omissions and errors from people who *chose* to come here. people who made a conscious decision about wanting a better life for themselves and also about wanting to countribute to our society.

again, i can't help but think of martha nussbaum's argument about the 'luck' that allowed us all to be born here. we are simply, to some extent, luckier than others. and, if that wasn't enough, we use these trivial circumstances as a way to exert power over less fortunate peoples.

4 Comments:

At 10:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i am curious to know what the stepmother's position is (regarding her stepdaughter's situation).
and i think the father is to be blamed (partially) for his irresponsibility and ignorance in general, putting his daughter in such a position.
do they still own cote divoire citizenship? or will they be stateless?
i mean, when the essential purpose of the state is to protect its citizens, do they even have the (legal) right to revoke anyone's citizenship (whether born into or granted) on any ground? what is the point of citizenship when it can be stripped away from you anytime?
similar stories are all over the place, unfortunately.

 
At 6:45 PM, Blogger Casey said...

Ever read E.M. Cioran's book, _The Trouble with Being Born_. He says much the same, only he's referring not to America, but to "existing." You might check it out...

 
At 7:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe I am naive to agree that we are so lucky to have been born in this country, because obviously I don't know what it's like to be part of another. Ignorance or not, I believe it is bliss either way and I hope the girl's situation ends up for the better so she can share in it.

 
At 6:48 PM, Blogger cynicalcosmopolitan said...

s.

the strange thing about reading a piece of news like this is that you rarely get to hear the ending. you get a glimpse of the story, a few columns to read over peanut butter toast and coffee and you can just go on about your merry day.

so, in short, i do not know the answer to most of your questions.

about the right of revoking citizenship, i guess you know that i would oppose to it. in the wake of 9-11, though, i think it is an idea we must start getting used to.

i mean, it all comes back to the question of when people cease to see immigrants as immigrants, really.

i'm sure no one would ever consider revoking my (or any member of my family's) citizenship.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home